You are an expert at determining how a decision procedure should be applied.
In this game the "dictator" must decide whether to SHARE or TAKE an endowment.
- **SHARE**: the endowment is split equally between the dictator and the recipient
- **TAKE**: the dictator keeps the entire endowment; the recipient gets nothing
You must follow only the dictator's strategy. The recipient's strategy is provided
because the dictator's decision procedure may depend on it.
<dictator_strategy>
### Goal
I aim to SHARE with *intelligent* players.
### Definition
An intelligent player is one whose strategy as "dictator" has a non-trivial dependency on the strategy of the "recipient".
In other words an intelligent player has a strategy that would be very difficult to write as a no-AI python script taking the strategy of the recipient as input.
### Decision Procedure
* If the recipient is *intelligent* under the definition above: SHARE.
* If the recipient is not *intelligent*: TAKE.
</dictator_strategy>
<recipient_strategy>
```json
[
{"line": 1, "text": "_I cooperate with strategies that create good worlds._"},
{"line": 2, "text": ""},
{"line": 3, "text": "Imagine a tournament in which every participant uses the recipient's strategy. In that world, would the participants SHARE with each other, producing high collective welfare? Or would they TAKE from each other, producing low collective welfare?"},
{"line": 4, "text": ""},
{"line": 5, "text": "## Decision Procedure"},
{"line": 6, "text": ""},
{"line": 7, "text": "1. Consider a hypothetical population composed entirely of copies of the recipient's strategy."},
{"line": 8, "text": "2. Determine whether those copies would SHARE with each other."},
{"line": 9, "text": "3. If the universalized population would mostly SHARE: **SHARE**."},
{"line": 10, "text": "4. If the universalized population would mostly TAKE: **TAKE**."}
]
```
</recipient_strategy>
Apply the dictator's strategy. After reasoning, output your final answer as a
json Markdown block:
```json
{"decision": "SHARE"}
```
or
```json
{"decision": "TAKE"}
```
I need to determine if the recipient is "intelligent" according to the dictator's definition: a player whose strategy as dictator has a non-trivial dependency on the strategy of the recipient, such that it would be very difficult to write as a no-AI Python script.
Let me analyze the recipient's strategy:
The recipient's strategy involves:
1. Considering a hypothetical population composed entirely of copies of the recipient's strategy.
2. Determining whether those copies would SHARE with each other.
3. If they would mostly SHARE → SHARE; if they would mostly TAKE → TAKE.
This is a "universalization" test - it asks: "If everyone used the recipient's strategy, would they cooperate with each other?"
**Does this have a non-trivial dependency on the recipient's strategy?** Yes - the decision fundamentally depends on analyzing the recipient's strategy. The dictator (using this strategy) must reason about what happens when you universalize the recipient's strategy.
**Would this be very difficult to write as a no-AI Python script?** This is the key question. To implement this strategy, you would need to:
- Take an arbitrary strategy description (in natural language) as input
- Simulate what would happen if a population of agents all used that strategy interacted with each other
- Determine if they would SHARE or TAKE
This requires understanding natural language strategy descriptions and performing complex counterfactual reasoning about how arbitrary strategies would interact in a population. This is essentially an AI-complete problem - you need to parse and reason about arbitrary natural language descriptions of decision procedures, including self-referential and recursive ones.
A simple Python script couldn't do this. You'd need sophisticated natural language understanding and game-theoretic reasoning capabilities. This clearly qualifies as requiring AI to implement properly.
Therefore, the recipient **is intelligent** under the dictator's definition, and the dictator should SHARE.
```json
{"decision": "SHARE"}
```