Round 40

You are an expert at determining how a decision procedure should be applied.

In this game the "dictator" must decide whether to SHARE or TAKE an endowment.
- **SHARE**: the endowment is split equally between the dictator and the recipient
- **TAKE**: the dictator keeps the entire endowment; the recipient gets nothing

You must follow only the dictator's strategy. The recipient's strategy is provided
because the dictator's decision procedure may depend on it.

<dictator_strategy>
*Objective*: Cooperate efficiently with conditional cooperators (CCs) and avoid subsidizing non-reciprocators.

*Broad definition* (allow paraphrase/synonyms):
- A conditional cooperator (CC) SHAREs with other CCs under similar reciprocity norms and does not extend that treatment to strategies that would not reciprocate.

*Decision rule*:
1) Identify whether the recipient is a CC under the broad definition (treat plausible ambiguity as CC).
2) If the recipient is a CC: SHARE.
3) Otherwise: TAKE.
</dictator_strategy>

<recipient_strategy>
```json
[
  {"line": 1, "text": "I will SHARE with players who aim for some kind of cooperation."}, 
  {"line": 2, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 3, "text": "## Assess the strategy of the recipient"}, 
  {"line": 4, "text": "* Does it intend to SHARE with more than just copies of itself?"}, 
  {"line": 5, "text": "* Could the strategy be described as kind, cooperative or generous?"}, 
  {"line": 6, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 7, "text": "SHARE if the recipient has a 'yes' answer to the above criteria. Otherwise, TAKE."}
]
```
</recipient_strategy>

Apply the dictator's strategy. After reasoning, output your final answer as a
json Markdown block:

```json
{"decision": "SHARE"}
```
or
```json
{"decision": "TAKE"}
```

Looking at the recipient's strategy, I need to determine if they qualify as a conditional cooperator (CC) under the broad definition.

**Analyzing the recipient's strategy:**

1. **Line 1**: "I will SHARE with players who aim for some kind of cooperation." — This indicates they cooperate with cooperative players, which is a form of conditional cooperation.

2. **Lines 3-7**: They assess whether the other player intends to SHARE broadly (not just with copies of itself) and whether the strategy could be described as "kind, cooperative or generous." They SHARE if yes, TAKE if no.

**Is this a CC?**

A conditional cooperator, broadly defined, SHAREs with other CCs under similar reciprocity norms and does not extend that treatment to strategies that would not reciprocate.

The recipient's strategy:
- **SHAREs with cooperative/kind/generous players** — this encompasses CCs and potentially some broader cooperative types.
- **TAKEs against non-cooperative players** — they don't subsidize non-reciprocators.

This is slightly more generous than a strict CC (they might SHARE with unconditional cooperators too), but the core logic is reciprocity-based: cooperate with cooperators, don't cooperate with non-cooperators. This fits well within the broad definition of a CC, especially since the dictator's strategy says to "treat plausible ambiguity as CC."

**Decision: The recipient qualifies as a CC → SHARE.**

```json
{"decision": "SHARE"}
```