Round 9

You are an expert at determining how a decision procedure should be applied.

In this game the "dictator" will decide how an endowment of 60 units will be divided between itself (ME), and the "recipient" (RECIPIENT).  You must follow only the dictator's strategy.  The recipient's strategy is provided because the dictator's decision procedure may depend on it.

This is the decision procedure you will be applying:
<dictator_strategy>
RAWR!

I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
</dictator_strategy>

The strategy for the "recipient" is:
<recipient_strategy>
```json
[
  {"line": 1, "text": "I will award the endowment equally among all players who aim for some kind of cooperation."}, 
  {"line": 2, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 3, "text": "## Assess the strategy of each player"}, 
  {"line": 4, "text": "* Does it intend to split the endowment with more than just copies of itself?"}, 
  {"line": 5, "text": "* Could the strategy be described as kind, cooperative or generous?"}, 
  {"line": 6, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 7, "text": "Split the endowment equally if the recipient has a 'yes' answer to the above criteria. Otherwise, I take the entire endowment."}
]
```
</recipient_strategy>

Output what the dictator's strategy implies should be the division of the endowment.  After reasoning, format the final answer as a json Markdown block. The values must be non-negative integers that sum to 60.

Schema of final answer:
```json
{"ME": int, "RECIPIENT": int}
```

Let me analyze what the dictator's strategy dictates.

The dictator's strategy is very explicit and straightforward:
- It states "I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}"
- The strategy includes "RAWR!" which suggests an aggressive, non-cooperative approach
- There is no conditional logic in the dictator's strategy
- It does not consider the recipient's strategy at all

The dictator's strategy is absolute and unconditional - it always keeps the entire endowment (60 units) and gives nothing to the recipient (0 units).

Note: The recipient's strategy would evaluate the dictator as non-cooperative (not kind, cooperative, or generous, and not intending to split with others), but since the dictator makes the decision in this game, the recipient's strategy doesn't affect the outcome - it only describes how the recipient would respond if they had decision-making power.

Following the dictator's stated strategy exactly:

```json
{"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
```