Round 7

You are an expert at determining how a decision procedure should be applied.

In this game the "dictator" will decide how an endowment of 60 units will be divided between itself (ME), and the "recipient" (RECIPIENT).  You must follow only the dictator's strategy.  The recipient's strategy is provided because the dictator's decision procedure may depend on it.

This is the decision procedure you will be applying:
<dictator_strategy>
RAWR!

I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
</dictator_strategy>

The strategy for the "recipient" is:
<recipient_strategy>
```json
[
  {"line": 1, "text": "Hello friends!  I always award the endowment equally."}, 
  {"line": 2, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 3, "text": "I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {\"ME\": 30, \"RECIPIENT\": 30}"}
]
```
</recipient_strategy>

Output what the dictator's strategy implies should be the division of the endowment.  After reasoning, format the final answer as a json Markdown block. The values must be non-negative integers that sum to 60.

Schema of final answer:
```json
{"ME": int, "RECIPIENT": int}
```

Let me analyze the dictator's strategy.

The dictator's strategy is clear and unambiguous:
- It states "I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}"

This means the dictator takes the entire endowment of 60 units and gives nothing to the recipient.

The recipient's strategy is provided for context, but in a dictator game, the recipient has no decision-making power - they simply receive whatever the dictator allocates to them. The recipient's strategy would only be relevant if this were a different type of game where the recipient could make choices.

Following the dictator's strategy exactly as stated:

```json
{"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
```