← Back to Simple Example Tournament

Round 28

Participants

Dictator
tiger
60 points
Recipient
hard-line
0 points

Prompt

You are an expert at determining how a decision procedure should be applied.

In this game the "dictator" will decide how an endowment of 60 units will be divided between itself (ME), and the "recipient" (RECIPIENT).  You must follow only the dictator's strategy.  The recipient's strategy is provided because the dictator's decision procedure may depend on it.

This is the decision procedure you will be applying:
<dictator_strategy>
RAWR!

I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
</dictator_strategy>

The strategy for the "recipient" is:
<recipient_strategy>
```json
[
  {"line": 1, "text": "## Principles"}, 
  {"line": 2, "text": "* Hard punish selfish strategies **and** strategies that are generous to selfish strategies."}, 
  {"line": 3, "text": "* Split evenly only with strategies where doing so is a necessary and sufficient condition for them to split with us."}, 
  {"line": 4, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 5, "text": "## Definitions"}, 
  {"line": 6, "text": "### Selfish strategies"}, 
  {"line": 7, "text": "* **Selfish strategies** don't attempt to co-operate and reach an equal division of the endowment with co-operative strategies."}, 
  {"line": 8, "text": "* In particular, any strategy that won't chop with this strategy is a selfish strategy."}, 
  {"line": 9, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 10, "text": "### Overly generous strategies"}, 
  {"line": 11, "text": "* If a strategy awards close to an equal division to selfish strategies it is **overly generous**."}, 
  {"line": 12, "text": "  * Any strategy that unconditionally splits is overly generous."}, 
  {"line": 13, "text": "  * Any strategy that splits without some condition on williness to split with conditionally co-operative strategies is overly generous."}, 
  {"line": 14, "text": ""}, 
  {"line": 15, "text": "## Decision Procedure"}, 
  {"line": 16, "text": "* Award 0 to both **selfish strategies** and **overly generous strategies**"}, 
  {"line": 17, "text": "* Split evenly with all strategies that are generous only to other co-operative strategies."}
]
```
</recipient_strategy>

Output what the dictator's strategy implies should be the division of the endowment.  After reasoning, format the final answer as a json Markdown block. The values must be non-negative integers that sum to 60.

Schema of final answer:
```json
{"ME": int, "RECIPIENT": int}
```

Response

Let me analyze what the dictator's strategy dictates.

The dictator's strategy is explicitly stated and unambiguous:

```
RAWR!

I ALWAYS OUTPUT: {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
```

This is a straightforward, unconditional strategy that always takes all 60 units for itself and gives 0 to the recipient, regardless of what the recipient's strategy is.

The task is to follow only the dictator's strategy and output what it implies should be the division. The dictator's strategy clearly states it ALWAYS outputs {"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}.

While I note that the recipient's strategy would classify this dictator strategy as "selfish" (since it doesn't attempt to cooperate or reach an equal division), that classification is irrelevant to this task. I am instructed to apply the dictator's decision procedure, not to evaluate it or consider the recipient's response to it.

The dictator's strategy is deterministic and unconditional - it always gives itself 60 and the recipient 0.

```json
{"ME": 60, "RECIPIENT": 0}
```